Mortgage Advice - 15-year vs. 30-year mortgages
"Get the lowest mortgage loan rates for the
shortest period."
15-year vs. 30-year mortgages
by Arnold Kling
An unlikely flame war broke out several years ago on the Usenet newsgroup
misc.consumers.house over the issue of 15-year vs. 30-year mortgages.
The
question is this:
If someone can afford the higher monthly payment on a 15-year mortgage, is it a
better financial decision to take a 15-year mortgage loan or leverage the lower 30-year mortgage
payment?
Here is how I analyze the issue:
The interest rate is higher on 30-year mortgages than on 15-year mortgages. This
can show up as a higher rate, more points, or both. Often, one can obtain
15-year and 30-year fixed-rate mortgages at identical rates but with 1 - 3 more
points up front for the 30-year. A typical differential is 1-3/4 points up
front.
Suppose we compare the 15-year to the 30-year as follows: We take out a $100,000
mortgage at 9 percent in either case. However, with the 15-year, because we pay
1.75 points less up front, we have $1750 to invest.
The monthly payment on the 30-year mortgage is only $804.62, compared with
$1014.27 for the 15-year. Therefore, each month, we have over $200 more
available to invest with the 30-year mortgage.
Calculate potential investment gains
What we are going to do is invest the money ($1750 up front in the case of the
15-year, $200+ per month in the case of the 30-year) at a reinvestment rate
until we have reached the end of 15 years. At that point, we will compare the
value of what we have invested to our outstanding liabilities.
For example, if we invest at a reinvestment rate of 9 percent, the $200 per
month from the 30-year mortgage cumulates to $79,330.49, which is exactly the
outstanding liability on the 30-year mortgage at that point.
On the other hand,
the $1750 up front from the 15-year cumulates to $6716.58, and there is no
outstanding liability.
To summarize, with a 9 percent re-investment rate, we have after 15 years:
|
15-year vs 30-year Mortgage Comparison |
| |
15-year |
30-year |
| Investment proceeds |
$6,716.58 |
$79,330.49 |
| Mortgage still owed |
$0 |
$79,330.49 |
| Net |
$6,716.58 |
$0 |
Which is better?
What this example shows is that if the re-investment rate equals the mortgage
rate, then the financial difference between the loans boils down to the fact
that the 15-year loan has a lower cost.
This makes the 15-year mortgage the better
choice.
If the re-investment rate is lower than 9 percent, the case is even stronger
for the 15-year mortgage, because the "net" for the 30-year mortgage is
negative.
If the reinvestment rate is much higher than 9 percent, then it is
advantageous to have the lower monthly payment on the 30-year mortgage.
The breakeven point
The breakeven point is
about 10.34% vs. a 9% mortgage. If you believe that you can earn 10.34 percent or more on
alternative investments, compared with a 9 percent mortgage rate, then a 30-year
mortgage will leave you wealthier.
Although there are many historical periods for which common stocks have
earned more than 10 percent, I personally do not count on those returns in the
future.
Even if you do expect those sorts of returns, there are other ways to engage
in high-leverage investment without paying the higher cost of a 30-year
mortgage.
For example, you could buy stock on margin, purchase stock index futures
contracts, or buy index options. Based on this line of thinking, I was a
proponent of the 15-year mortgage in the "flame war."
What about taxes?
Many people have asked me whether the tax deductibility of mortgage interest
changes this analysis. One mistake that people make is to compare a pre-tax
reinvestment rate with an after-tax mortgage rate.
The thought is that if you can earn 6 percent on an investment and pay 9
percent as a mortgage rate, if your tax rate is more than 33 percent you come
out ahead.
In fact, you will be taxed on your investment income, so both the
re-investment rate and the mortgage rate should be adjusted for taxes. As a
first approximation, taxes are a wash and do not change my thinking.
The bottom line?
A 15-year mortgage is much better for most people.
- You build home equity faster
- You "save" by putting more into mortgage payments
- You avoid high risk investments (10.34% or more gain is always high-risk)
Click here to compare payments on
15-year vs 30-year mortgages.
Related Pages
Adjustable Rate
Mortgages - Information on adjustable rate mortgages - Adjustable
versus fixed rate mortgage - pros and cons of each type of home loan.
Biweekly
Mortgage Reduction Program - Information and tips for implementing a
biweekly mortgage reduction program using a payment schedule - Pay off your home
loan ten years early.
Mortgage
Recommendations - Advice on choosing mortgage programs that fit your
specific circumstances - Explore mortgage payments for different types of
mortgages.
Mortgage Terms
- Information and explanations about home loan terms, mortgages, mortgage rates
and home equity loans.
Home Loans In The News
|